This page lists every statistic quoted on lobod.rocks with the study it comes from, the sample, the date and the one caveat that matters. Numbers are rounded on the site and exact here; we re-check each link every quarter.
Every statistic on this site comes from a published study. This page is the ledger: the exact figure, what it measures, the sample, the date, the caveat you should know, and the link. If you are checking our claims, start with the caveat column.
People in Spain who use ChatGPT frequently, in the 2023, 2024 and 2025 editions of the survey
Online survey, n=1,200, ages 18 to 75, representative of residents of Spain
12 Jan 2026 (fieldwork Dec 2025)
Self-reported. The PDF press release is dated 12/01/2026 and says the survey ran "el pasado diciembre"; the Funcas web page shows 12 January 2025 in its header, so we link the PDF
Under-45s using any AI tool daily; frequent use of Gemini, Copilot, and Perplexity, Claude or Grok
Same survey
12 Jan 2026
Perplexity and Claude are near zero in Spain by this measure, which matters when an audit weights four assistants equally
Same
SE Ranking: organic search and AI traffic in its Spain sample
Number
What it measures
Sample
Date
Caveat
Link
52.02% to 40.70%
Organic search's share of traffic in Spain within SE Ranking's sample, full-year 2025 versus January to April 2026
101,574 sites with valid SE Ranking analytics tracking
17 Jun 2026
A share inside one tool's sample, not all of Google and not a random sample of the web. It does not show what caused the drop, and SE Ranking itself writes that AI does not explain it on its own. Spain's drop (11.32 points) compares with 2.59 points globally
Links cited in AI answers that come from what Muck Rack calls "earned and third-party sources": journalism, government and NGO sites, academic research, encyclopedic sources and third-party corporate content
Generative Pulse data, 40M+ AI responses and 207M citations in 2026, plus 1,020 prompts on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity in September; fourth edition
28 Oct 2026
Much wider than editorial PR: journalism alone is 22%. Muck Rack sells PR software; the public summary gives no prompt language or country. Previous edition (May 2026): 84% "earned media", 82% to 89% across the three editions since July 2025
Small prompt set; ChatGPT cites 87% and names 20.7%, Gemini names 83.7% and cites 21.4%; comparative prompts get 43.3% mentions against 18% for informational
Cited LinkedIn content that is long-form articles; cited content that is feed posts, depending on the engine
Same
10 Mar 2026
Shares of what was cited, not citation rates per piece
Same
About 75%
Cited post authors who had published five or more posts in the four weeks before
Same
10 Mar 2026
An observation about who was cited, not an experiment: it does not show that posting five times leads to citation. Semrush calls the link "our theory", and its text says both "5+" and "over 5"
Same
15 to 25
Reactions on the median cited post, with no more than one comment
Same
10 Mar 2026
Median of cited posts only
Same
Evertune
Number
What it measures
Sample
Date
Caveat
Link
63%
Citations pointing to listicles; 71% to 86% of those are ranked lists, depending on the model
About 25,000 most-cited URLs, about 400M citations, six engines
19 May 2026
Vendor research reported by Search Engine Land; the most-cited URLs are not the whole web
ChatGPT citations that remain after running the same prompt three times
AirOps, 815,000 prompt-page pairs, same article
10 Jun 2026
Indig's five runs per prompt per platform per week is his method, not a study result
Same
Bain & Company
Number
What it measures
Sample
Date
Caveat
Link
61%; 22%
People in Spain who use generative AI (from 5% in 2023); people who have replaced traditional search with AI chatbots most of the time, the highest rate in Europe
Bain Gen AI Consumer Survey 2025, Spain figures via IT Reseller
16 Feb 2026
Sample size not stated; any use, not frequent use, hence far above Funcas' 28%
On the site, numbers are rounded so a tile reads in a second: 52% to 41%, not 52.02% to 40.70%. Here they are exact. We do not mix waves: when Ahrefs or Muck Rack publish a new edition, we replace the figure and keep the old one in the caveat column. Studies that measure Spain (Funcas, SE Ranking, Bain, InfoAdex, Ahrefs ES) give market context; studies that do not measure Spain specifically (Muck Rack, Semrush, Evertune, Surfer, SISTRIX, AirOps; some state no prompt language or country) explain the mechanism only, and the Spain data page says which is which. Last verified: 9 September 2026; the Funcas, SE Ranking, Muck Rack and Semrush LinkedIn rows were read again on 30 October 2026. Only sources we could open and check are used here.
SE Ranking, Tráfico de IA en España 20262026-06101,574 sites with SE Ranking analytics tracking, not a random sample of the web; 2026 means January to April; SE Ranking says AI does not explain the organic drop on its own.
Muck Rack, What Is AI Reading? (October 2026 edition)2026-10-28Generative Pulse data, 40M+ AI responses and 207M citations in 2026, plus 1,020 prompts on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity in September; published by a PR software vendor.
Semrush, LinkedIn AI visibility study2026-0389,000 LinkedIn URLs cited across 325,000 prompts on ChatGPT Search, Google AI Mode and Perplexity, January to February 2026; an observational study.
